His father had little education; he worked as a metal polisher. However, he rose to a position of leadership, serving as the Commissioner of Public Safety for the city of Newark from to Brennan attended public schools in Newark, and graduated from Barringer High School in He then attended the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvaniawhere he graduated cum laude with a degree in economics in
The aim of the Antitrust Writing Awards is to promote competition scholarship and to contribute to competition advocacy. The Antitrust Writing Awards Jury contributes to this achievement by selecting the best writings published in The Antitrust Writing Awards consist of: Selection of the most innovative non-enforcement tools published by competition agencies such as guidelines, market studies, white papers, etc.
Analysis Group Authors Nominated for Concurrences Antitrust Writing Awards January 12, Three papers authored by Analysis Group consultants have been nominated for the Antitrust Writing Awards, a joint initiative between Concurrences Review and the George Washington University Law School. Mar 26, · The Antitrust Writing Awards is a joint initiative between Concurrences Review and the George Washington University Law School. Learn more about the Jury, the Awards categories and Rules on the dedicated website here. Welcome to the Free E-mail Database. This page is a public service to provide E-mail addresses for any purpose you may need. Drawing from a constantly-updated database, we offer up free lists of E-mail address to hundreds of users per day!
Ranking of the best law firms antitrust newsletters. The edition of the Awards will take place on March 26, The Academic Articles category comprises long articles published in academic journals The articles are selected by the Jury and by Readers.
The Jury consists of a Board, an Academic and a Business Steering Committees composed of the leading academics and counsels. Readers of Concurrences Review and its sister publication e-Competitions contribute to the selection process by voting for articles. Click here to see the Jury.
To ensure transparency, but also impartiality and expertise in the processing of the Awards, publications are assessed following an international peer-reviewed evaluation process.
Members of the Board and of the Steering Committees are chosen from world-renowned antitrust enforcers, counsels and academics who are committed to judging the Awards fairly.
Click here to see the Rules. Alongside the ICN work, it seeks to support international antitrust advocacy by drawing attention towards the most meaningful competition agency practices.
It aims at singling out some of the most interesting administration practices that could be usefully applied more generally. Eligible publications are non-enforcement tools such as guidelines, market studies, white papers etc.
The Editorial Committee has invited competition agencies to submit their best soft law documents. The Steering Committees and Readers will vote for the 10 most innovative documents. Awards They are around 80 antitrust professional publications published by both law firms and economic consulting firms.
Quality and interest of these publication vary but are going into the right direction due to increased competition between firms. The increased number of ranking of individual lawyers or firms practices has make it necessary for firms to show their expertise in a different way.
However, client capacities to read or browse such publications is limited and they are just too many of them and too many the same to have a fair view of what is worth reading. Ranking such publications is meant to guide readers on which publications they should read first, depending what they are looking for.
Our empirical study showed that there is a concern that the activity, which is designed to raise safety concerns, has been used by brand drug companies to delay generic entry. It is a true honor to receive such an award, which will hopefully raise awareness of this conduct.
And I am grateful to Concurrences and GW for their creation of these awards and all of the work they do every year to run the competition and host a delightful dinner.
In highlighting scholarship that is particularly deserving of attention, Concurrences and GW provide a real service to the antitrust community. This initiative will, I hope, increase the quality and depth of such writing to provide the practical complement to academic articles.
By collecting the best writing in the field of practitioners and academics, the Awards create a one-stop shop that saves tremendous amounts of time and keeps readers fully cognizant of the best new work The Antitrust Writing Awards uniquely embrace and celebrate that scope for the benefit of all workers in the field.
They have helped to spread competition law insights and knowledge throughout the world. This not only rewards the authors, but also is very helpful for practitioners, because it highlights the most interesting and influential papers from an increasing flood of publications that is more and more difficult to follow.
They accompany and consecrate the rising prominence and impact of competition law on the global economy. These awards have surely made antitrust academics and practitioners more alert to the value of writing well, with attention not only to substantive analysis but also to clarity and economy of presentation.
Our field is blessed with an erudite academy and an intellectually sophisticated bar; the Concurrences Awards bring out the best in both. To have our work not only recognized, but recognized by board members whose work we respect so much and by institutions with so much credibility, is a rare and delightful treat.
Academics and practitioners making valuable contributions to the literature see their names recognised and their work publicizedCleary Gottlieb has been recognized by Concurrences with two awards at its Antitrust Writing Awards.
Cleary won the following: “Best Business Article” (General Antitrust Category) ; Authors: Maurits Dolmans and Ricardo Zimbron. SAMPLE BRIEF. Gray (cop) benjaminpohle.como (crime victim).
Procedural History. Cop sues for reward money. District court awards money to the cop. Defendant appeals. Issue. At the time the contract was formed, was the plaintiff acting as a police officer charged with a . Analysis Group Authors Nominated for Concurrences Antitrust Writing Awards January 12, Three papers authored by Analysis Group consultants have been nominated for the Antitrust Writing Awards, a joint initiative between Concurrences Review and the George Washington University Law School.
The Antitrust Writing Awards results were made public at the Gala Dinner on April 10, - the day before the ABA Antitrust Spring Meeting - in Washington DC. ORGANIZERS Concurrences Review and George Washington University Law School Competition Law Center, are organizing the Antitrust Writing Awards with the support .
Wolfgang Kerber, Gerard, Damien (ed.), Dynamic Markets and Dynamic Enforcement - The impact of the digital revolution and globalisation on the enforcement of competition law in Europe, Bruylant, Forthcoming Antitrust Writing Awards - Jury The Awards Jury comprises the Board, the Academic and Business Steering Committees, the Editorial Committee and the Readers.
Each of these contribute to the Awards selection process.