Authenticating or Identifying Evidence Rule Authenticating or Identifying Evidence a In General. To satisfy the requirement of authenticating or identifying an item of evidence, the proponent must produce evidence sufficient to support a finding that the item is what the proponent claims it is.
In the fall ofafter having spent two-thirds of their search fund capital and reviewed over companies, they came across Eyewitness Surveillance, a company specializing in the use of video technology to protect the assets of car dealerships.
Eyewitness' cofounder, Vince Redland, was interested in selling the company to pursue other interests and Arnold and McCloy found the industry, company, and deal all compelling. Over the course of the next two months, they engaged in a due diligence process which further validated their interest in the company, but also raised several red flags.
Among the issues highlighted in due diligence included widespread employee disgruntlement, particularly with Vince who was also the top sales persona reluctance to share detailed financial information, and an 11th hour disagreement about a contract clause stipulating that the purchase price would go down if monthly revenues declined after the close.
Despite having conducted a thorough and in-depth due diligence process, Arnold and McCloy were at the end of their search capital and facing a deal that was on the brink. They were now faced with the question of whether or not they wanted to charge ahead, despite the red flags, or walk away, knowing that write a memo on eyewitness identification could potentially be the end of the road.
Therefore, it is essential that you have a professional case study recommendation memo. The purpose of a recommendation memo is to concisely recommend a course of action and provide rationale supporting the recommendation. The case study recommendation memo is a one-two page document not including exhibits that recommends your course of action and rationale.
This format promotes a concise and clear strategic thought process. First Paragraph of Eyewitness Surveillance recommendation memo This paragraph expresses your intent or action that you required after reading the Eyewitness Surveillance case study This recommends…….
Ends with the hook: What you intend to do after reading the case and it clearly mention your decision. Background of Eyewitness Surveillance case study This paragraph explains why we are talking about this today.
It lays out the story. It provides us details from the case story such as - Historical perspective on the problem is provided.
Details are elaborated that underline the given problem. Highlights - what brought us to this moment, why we are in this position, what brought about the need to make this decision.
Dimensionalize the importance of the problem to the organization and how it is impacting the organization.
Constraints — Provide a situational analysis based on case study analysis. Keep the background section both factual and concise. It is part of the memo where we provide a brief insight into the problem and define the problem. Checklist Is the background clear, concise, and easy to follow?
Does it explain why action is needed now? Does the appropriate sense of urgency come across in the case study? Recommendations for Eyewitness Surveillance Case Memo Recommendations section will provide details regarding what is needed to be done, how it can be done, when to do it and who will do it.
It can be elaborated with scenario planning as businesses The details of what, when and how. It must be actionable How much will it cost, when, how, who. The reader should be able to read this and know how to carry out this recommendation. Some cases will require more than one recommendation.
It often happens that the firm will require more than one recommendations as there are numerous unknown in the market place. Checklist Is the recommendation clear and actionable?
Does the firm has capability to implement the recommendations or does it needs to hire fresh talent?
Orignal recommendation can be backed by few supporting roadmap to actions. Support includes impact on profit, share, and anything else that can affect long-term business goals of the firm.
Analysis should address applicable quantitative issues such as NPV, break even analysis, pro forma statement of project budget, sensitivity analysis; as well as qualitative issues, such as, technology consistency, architectural conformance, innovation potential, etc. Appeals to precedent and anecdotal evidence in absence of data, but only in limited, carefully constrained manner.
Shows how the recommendation will put the firm at a competitive advantage or is simply acompetitive necessity.
The goal is to read the basis and conclude the recommendation. Checklist Is the recommendation an inescapable conclusion of the basis? Does the basis for recommendation appropriately consider: Core competencies and consistency with mission?
External customers and internal clients? Attractiveness — quantitative measures if applicable e. Are all assumptions explicitly stated e.Eyewitness testimony can make a deep impression on a jury, which is often exclusively on eyewitness identification, they are often unaware of the danger of false memories.
write a letter of recommendation for one roommate’s application to a fraternity or sorority, or to write a letter to the office of student housing requesting the. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE. EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION.
PROCEDURES FOR CONDUCTING PHOTO ARRAYS. 1. Location of the Photo Array · Unless impracticable, the witness should view the photo array out of earshot and view of.
memorandum implies that an identification not done in accordance with these procedures is DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE. EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION. PROCEDURES FOR CONDUCTING PHOTO ARRAYS. 1. No other writing or information should be visible.
This article is about how the Oregon Supreme Court made a decision on how eyewitness identification is to be used in criminal trials. Write a memo, cover letter, or resume for a fitness or sports-related career application.
7. 1. Write a first person narrative telling what happened. After following protocol as to how you will go about writing your report, it is then time to draft your incident report. Remember to sequence all the events that have transpired in order so that the concerned parties can be able to keep track properly of what happened first to what happened last.
Wells, G.L., and E. Seelau, “Eyewitness Identification: Psychological Research and Legal Policy on Lineups,” Psychology, Public Policy and Law 1 (): [note 15] Mecklenburg, Report to the Legislature of the State of Illinois: The Illinois Pilot Program .